ASW "Stone" heavy-duty push-off trailer with Fliegl push-off technology!


Using the ASW "Stone" heavy-duty push-off trailer pays dividends for companies operating in the road construction and earthmoving sectors. This has been demonstrated in practical tests involving the transport of excavated earth and gravel on airports, road and trail construction, brown coal opencast mining as well as earth wall and embankment work on motorway construction sites.

The tractor/trailer combination with the Fliegl heavy-duty push-off trailer always comes out in top in practical tests with competing transport units.

The benefits of the ASW Stone trailer at a glance


  • Complete emptying, even of highly viscous material (loam, wet ground and clay etc., including in winter)

  • Safe unloading, even on sloping ground

  • Straightforward push-off in load buildings, tunnels or underground

  • Hydraulically sprung drawbar

  • With hydraulic suspension:
    maximum comfort = first-class ride comfort

  • No manual cleaning or scraping of the tipper bridge

 

 

  • No knocks and jolts like with rubber blocks 

  • Hydraulic height adjustment 

  • Very low requirement: only approx. 14/17 l (tandem), approx. 27 l (tridem) consumed oil volume from tank. Therefore, no on-board hydraulics with drive shaft required.

  • No material build-up, which would otherwise reduce the load volume and thus the effective payload over time.

Any questions?


Tel.: +49 (0)8631 307-382
Fax: +49 (0)8631 307-553
E-mail: baukom@fliegl.com


Benefits of the Fliegl push-off system:

 

 

  • No telescopic cylinder

 

 

  • Tried-and-tested system

  • Faster unloading

Practical test – transport of excavated earth on the grounds of Berlin Schönefeld Airport


With its robust Hardox steel construction, the Fliegl "ASW Stone" heavy-duty push off trailer is a highly flexible tool for transporting and unloading a wide range of rough and coarse materials such as rock, gravel, excavated earth and sand. The original Fliegl push-off technology combines low wear with rapid operation and offers significant advantages over other unloading systems. Its use offers impressive output rates during transport and unloading and helps to ensure significant cost savings. Among other things, this is due to the system's relatively low net weight owing to its self-supporting structure as well as the low oil and power requirements attributable to the lack of oil- and power-hungry telescopic cylinders.

Practical experience has shown that push-off trailers offer greater performance and economic efficiency than other unloading systems. This was established in a field test of different transport systems used to load, transport and unload excavated earth on the grounds of Berlin Schönefeld Airport. In the test, the following systems
were ranked in order of average load volume:

Tractor and Fliegl ASW 250 15.55 cbm
Tractor and dumper 14.16 cbm
Dump truck A 15.50 cbm
Dump truck B 20.80 cbm

All vehicles covered the same route, 97.6 km in nine round trips, which partially involved difficult terrain with very loose ground. A standard all-wheel-drive truck could not be used in these difficult conditions. The vehicles were loaded with an excavator equipped with a 2.5 cubic metre bucket.

Under the above conditions, the tractor/trailer combination with the Fliegl ASW 250 push-off trailer took first place with a performance coefficient of 2.24 per cubic metre of load volume. It was followed by dump trucks A and B with performance coefficients of 2.05 and 2.01 respectively. The tractor with dumper came last with a performance coefficient of 1.95. This shows that the tractor/trailer combination with sophisticated Fliegl push-off technology offers greater performance than both the standard dump trucks as well as the tractor and dumper trailer combination.

 

Field test – gravel transport at Inden coal mine


When it comes to fuel consumption per cubic metre of loaded material, the tractor with dumper comes out on top: It uses 0.65 l/m3 of diesel, followed by the tractor/trailer combination with the push-off trailer, which consumes 0.68 l/m3. Dump truck B uses 0.70 l/m3 while the diesel consumption of dump truck A is 0.87 l/m3.

When examining the profitability of transport measures, the final aspect to consider is the unit cost, that is the total cost including the machine rental as well as personnel and diesel costs per cubic metre of transported materials. These have been calculated at the current rate. In the up-to-date unit cost comparison, the tractor/trailer combination with the Fliegl ASW 250 push-off trailer comes out on top thanks to its performance figures. The unit cost breakdown is as follows:
 

Tractor/trailer combination with Fliegl ASW 250 1.72 euro/cbm
Tractor with dumper 1.98 euro/cbm
Dump truck B 2.14 euro/cbm
Dump truck A 2.20 euro/cbm

 

If, for example, a construction company were to use tractors with the Fliegl push-off trailer for a major project with 6.6 million cubic metres of excavated earth under identical conditions, the cost savings over the other transport options would be significant:

Savings over dump truck A 3.168 million euro
Savings over dump truck B 2.772 million euro
Savings over tractor with dumper 1.716 million euro

 

The field test involved a direct comparison between the transport unit Fendt Vario 936 (265 kW/360 hp) with the Fliegl "ASW 248 Stone" heavy-duty push off and a truck (301 kW/410 hp) with 8x4 all-wheel drive and special tyres. Both were loaded with a Komatsu PW 220 excavator. The ASW 248 accommodated just over 12 bucket loads of gravel on average, while the all-wheel drive truck was loaded with 11 buckets.

The gravel was transported on varying surfaces, both overlaid with gravel and consisting of loose, soft sand. Neither of the competitors had any trouble on the gravel paths. On the loose, unstable sand, the tractor with the "ASW 248 Stone" pulled away from the all-wheel drive truck thanks to the better traction of the towing vehicle.

The performance data was calculated on the basis of the recorded times, fuel consumption and the number of trips. The times were measured accurately with a stopwatch. The exact fuel consumption was determined for the Fendt Vario, while the relevant figure for the all-wheel drive truck was based on information from the driver.

Field test – gravel transport at Hambach coal mine


The performance and costs per operating hour (Oh) and cubic metre (m3) were calculated. The "ASW 248 Stone" transport unit completed 9 trips while the all-wheel drive truck covered 13. The measured and calculated data for both transport units is provided below:
 

           ASW 248 Stone All-wheel drive truck
Journey time (Ø) 13:58 min 15:28 min
Transported gravel volume (Ø) 78.00 cbm/Oh 64.00 cbm/Oh
Diesel consumption (Oh) 14.80 l/Oh 18.50 l/Oh
Diesel consumption (cbm) 0.189 l/cbm 0.290 l/cbm
Est. total cost (Oh) 60.00 €/Oh 63.00 €/Oh
Total costs (€/cbm) 0.77 €/cbm 0.98 €/cbm
Cost saving (€/cbm) 0.21 €/cbm

 

The "ASW 248 Stone" emerges victorious in the comparison by achieving a cost saving of 0.21 euro per cubic metre over its rival. This equates to savings of 210 euro for a transported load of 1000 cubic metres.

The transport unit Fendt Vario 936 with the Fliegl "ASW 248 Stone" heavy-duty push-off trailer was compared with a dump truck (218 kW / 296 hp) in a field test involving the transport of gravel at the opencast mine in Hambach. Both were loaded with around 4 buckets of gravel by a Volvo L150F wheel loader. They transported the loads over challenging surfaces consisting largely of extremely rough terrain with steep slopes and inclines as well as on loose and unstable sandy ground. On these difficult surfaces, both competitors offered good traction, though the dump truck made slower progress on soft and loose ground. On the challenging sloping terrain, the "ASW 248 Stone" impressed with its unwavering stability – largely attributable to the innovative push-off technology – while the dump truck found itself in some precarious situations during tipping.

The performance data was calculated on the basis of the recorded times, fuel consumption and the number of trips. The times were measured accurately with a stopwatch. The exact fuel consumption was determined for the Fendt Vario, while the relevant figure for the dump truck was based on information from the driver. The "ASW 248 Stone" transport unit and the dump truck both completed 4 round trips. The measured and calculated data for both transport units is provided below:

ASW 248 Stone Dump truck
Journey time (Ø) 29:00 min 32:42 min
Transported gravel volume (Ø) 37.22 cbm/Oh 33.01 cbm/Oh
Diesel consumption (Oh) 16.20 l/Oh 25.80 l/Oh
Diesel consumption (cbm) 0.430 l/cbm 0.910 l/cbm
Est. total cost (Oh) 60.00 €/Oh 83.00 €/Oh
Total costs (€/cbm) 1.61 €/cbm 2.51 €/cbm
Cost saving (€/cbm) 0.90 €/cbm

 

The "ASW 248 Stone" emerges victorious in the comparison by achieving a cost saving of 0.90 euro per cubic metre over its rival. This equates to savings of no less than 900 euro for a transported load of 1000 cubic metres.

ASW Stone trailer


Type Type               ASW 248 ASW 248   Type Type               ASW 252 ASW 252 ASW 252 ASW 252 ASW 367 ASW 367 ASW 367 ASW 367    
                Stone Stone                   Black Bull Black Bull Black Bull Black Bull    
                (Big Run) (Big Run)                   Floating Floating Hydraulic Air Air Hydraulic    
Capacity, heaped (volumetric) Capacity, heaped (volumetric)             m³ approx. 14.2 (11.7) 14.2 (11.7)   Capacity, slightly heaped (volumetric) Capacity, slightly (volumetric)             m³ approx.            
Total weight acc. to StVZO (depending on equipment)             up to kg 22,000   Total weight acc. to StVZO (depending on equipment)             up to kg 22,000 24,000 33,000 31,000    
Body length incl. 500 mm high-capacity rear panel             mm 5,300   Body length             mm 5,230 5,230 6,730 6,730    
Internal body width             mm 2,380   Internal body width             mm 2,370 2,370 2,370 2,370    
Lateral body height             mm 1,100   Lateral body height             mm 1,150 1,150 1,150 1,150    
Required/consumed oil volume from tank (oil volume for push-off process) Required/consumed oil volume from tank (oil volume for push-off process)             l approx. Only 14 (36) Only 14 (36)   Required/consumed oil volume from tank (oil volume for push-off process) Required/consumed oil volume from tank (oil volume for push-off process)             l approx. Only 17 (56) Only 17 (56) Only 17 (56) Only 17 (56) Only 27 (85) Only 27 (85) Only 27 (85) Only 27 (85)    
No. of brake axles               2   No. of brake axles               2 2 2 2    
Axle (brake)             mm 410x180   Axle (brake)             mm 410x180 410x180 410x180 410x180    
Axle cross section             mm 150x150   Axle cross section             mm 150x150 150x150 150x150 150x150    
Axle assembly, mechanically adjustable               Standard   Forced steering               / Standard Standard Standard    
"TITAN plus" axle assembly               Standard                     2nd axle 1st and 3rd axle 1st and 3rd axle 1st and 3rd axle 1st and 3rd axle    
Floating axle assembly               Optional   Floating assembly / air suspension               Floating standard / Air standard /    
Tyres 650/55-R26.5*               Standard   Hydraulic suspension               / Standard / Standard    
Traction bar, hydraulically sprung / height-adjustable               Standard   Tyres 650/55-R26.5               Standard Standard Standard Standard    
Automatic load-dependent brake force regulator (ALB)               Standard   Tyres 600/60-R30.5               / Optional Optional /    
Max. speed             km/h 40   Traction bar, hydraulically sprung / height-adjustable (reinforced V-drawbar)               Standard Standard Standard Standard    
                    Automatic load-dependent brake force regulator (ALB)               Standard Standard Standard Standard    
                    Max. speed             km/h 40 40 40 40